On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 02:10 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > * It needs to be tested. The prototype is available for three > weeks now at http://sspreitzer.fedorapeople.org/torrents/ - > please test! > We will make an F14 dual layer version once live images of TC2 > are available. Three weeks this coming Thursday. It's still Monday here. You mentioned on IRC that some testing has already been done; is there any wiki page with the results or any other testing data available? Some questions with my UX designer cap on: - For the dual layer, how do you intend to help users understand which side is which? (I'm guessing one side of the dual-layer is 32-bit, the other 64-bit?) - Does the manufacturer have a way of labeling the full center plastic ring or is it only just a narrow strip as with the SUSE discs? - If only a thin plastic ring is available, do you have any idea from the manufacturer on the character length limits of the label and a draft of what you would have it say for each side? How about character length limits for a wider center label? - Are these going to be provided in a printed sleeve? If so, do you have any mockups/designs/copy for the sleeve? - What style sleeve - cardboard pocket or one with a plastic ring? It seems since it would be printed dual-layer, it would be difficult to provide a good label for the disc making the sleeve design even more critical for identifying the disc and instructing users on how to use it. > * The (one and only) desktop (TM) must not be referred to as the > "GNOME". We are not, please look at > http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/screenshots/f13-multi-desktop-dvd.png > GNOME is called "Fedora 14 Live" just like the ISO and is the > default selection. The only reference to the name GNOME is on > the filesystem. We will change this if it makes you happy. > I have a few concerns about the design of this menu: - Does every item need to mention Fedora 13? - Can the entire disk be verified with a single menu item? - Could the names for each of the desktop items be a bit more friendly and readable? E.g., rather than this, which I think is a little overwhelming to read: * Fedora-13-i686-Live * Verify and Boot Fedora-13-i686-Live * Fedora-13-i686-Live-KDE * Verify and Boot Fedora-13-i686-Live-KDE * Fedora-13-i686-Live-LXDE * Verify and Boot Fedora-13-i686-Live-LXDE * Fedora-13-i686-Live-XFCE * Verify and Boot Fedora-13-i686-Live-XFCE Could it maybe instead read like this, which I think is a bit more approachable: * Boot Fedora Live * Boot Fedora Live KDE * Boot Fedora Live LXDE * Boot Fedora Live XFCE * Verify media ? > Can we now please get the formal approval for the media? We cannot > afford to loose another week because we want the media available for the > F14 release events. Board members, could we add this to the agenda on Thursday 21 Oct? We were going to meet at 2 pm to discuss the codenames, right? Otherwise, it could be added to next Monday's (25 Oct) agenda. I'm not sure if it's possible to approve a trademark request without quorum, or over the mailing list? (Can any old-timer board members verify if this is or is not the case?) ~m _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
