Hi, I guess the advisory-board list is as good as it gets if I wanted to have a wider group discussing the point. So, here goes. My view, which I admit could be way off target, has been that the various Steering Committees within Fedora are 'enablers'. Or, in other words, they discuss, indulge in discourse and decide but with a simple objective - to make Fedora better. This could be extrapolated in terms of processes, technology, choices, goals and so forth. The point that I was pondering over for a couple of weeks is whether we actually do go back and ask the *SCo(s) to look inwards and ask as to what positive change they have brought forth. And, is that well articulated amongst the constituents of the project. As much as such change is a factor of the *SCo leadership team it is also a factor of how much the cross *SCo vision/goal sharing happens. Do the *SCo(s) have a formal process of discussing amongst themselves, the Board and the Fedora Project Leader at reasonably frequent intervals taking stock of the direction of the project ? So, have we really sat down and tried to assess how the Steering Committees have made things better ? /sankarshan -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <http://sankarshan.randomink.org/blog/> _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
