On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 08:10:16AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > We only ended up with 32 bit media at FISL, which based on how things went in > 2009 i did not figure it to be a big deal. in 2009 most people wanted 32 bit > and there was 64 bit left over. however this year there was a big change and > most people wanted 64 bit media. i think having dual would be really useful. > depending on how much extra the cost is per media we may actually be better > off since we could potentially give away more/all media and not get stuck with > a bunch of one arch left over. > Just a small difference in perspective -- a lot of people requested 64bit. For the large mass of people who just took what was offered to them we don't know if they actually wanted 64bit but stayed quiet, if 32bit was what they needed, or if they could have used 64bit if it was offered. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpahw8lURumY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
