Here's some issues that have been raised at recent Board meetings that I believe still require some follow-up. What do you think? 1 - Jon suggested that FESCO should look at setting Anaconda's freeze date earlier in the cycle. I think someone needs to bring this up with FESCO. 2 - We need to start working on a vision for Fedora. I'm not really sure where we should start. But we need to figure something out. 3 - Jared noted he would like to see FESCO 1) Making things more clear as to what constitutes a features being “100%” ready or “90%” ready; it’s not always clear what that means. 2) The other thing I would suggest (not really relevant to this discussion) is to make it clear which types of things should go through the “features” process, and which types of things can just be added as package updates (or new packages).” This needs to be brought up with FESCO. 4 - Robyn brought up today: "if there is something to be answered, can we call out the clear answer – if there is something to be followed up on, can we please define it, and get a timeline, or at least have someone responsible in the meeting for kicking off that followup on the advisory board list. Just for these public IRC q&a’s – It’s one hour, and we have a lot of community members, and I’d like to see that time well-used, questions answered." Which suggests we need an effort to determine tools/process to do this. 5 - We need to bring up the private-to-public discussion here on this list. I'll take the action item to do that. Then, of course, we need to work out how exactly it will work. I'll take ownership of that. 6 - We still need to make a decision on start.fpo - what it should pull up for current Fedora users. Also what it should be for future Fedora users. 7 - We should maybe decide to take some actions from the anthropology report? 8 - We had a question two public board meetings ago about an LTS equivalent. We had questions about this at the Fedora booth at LinuxCon this week. Should we write up some sort of statement/policy on this? Or at least include it in a FAQ? 9 - Are we going to continue to meet with SIG groups? If so we need to figure out which ones and when? 10 - Spins - do we want to revisit the issues they cause? As far as I know none of these have open tickets associated with them. ~m _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
