2010/2/20 Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:39:21PM -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Robyn Bergeron >> <robyn.bergeron@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > It seems like there is a definite disconnect on what needs to be done >> > as far as timing, scheduling, etc for the spins, at least from reading >> > this. Fedora gets pumped out every 6 months because we operate on a >> > tight, well-defined schedule. It seems like sitting down and defining >> > what a timeline might be for doing these things for a spin would be a >> > good idea, particularly if we can define how it would work in relation >> > to the overall Fedora schedule. >> > >> > Workflow is a good thing. Defining it and publishing it is even >> > better. If others feel that this is a definite, ongoing problem, then >> > we should resolve it together, not point fingers at each other. > > I agree. It's very frustrating to see contributors who feel they are > not being valued make other contributors feel the same way. In a lot > of cases the problems are miscommunication or misunderstanding, and > blowing that up into bad intentions is not helpful. Sorry, for posting that so late. I had a hard long workday without any access to a computer. It looks like i was the one contributor who started and made other contributors feel bad. It wasn't me alone who felt like that. I thought this might be clear after others added their thoughts as well. But anyways, i think i learned something. Next time i shut up in the first place. -- LG Thomas Dubium sapientiae initium _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
