On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Robyn Bergeron <robyn.bergeron@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It seems like there is a definite disconnect on what needs to be done > as far as timing, scheduling, etc for the spins, at least from reading > this. Fedora gets pumped out every 6 months because we operate on a > tight, well-defined schedule. It seems like sitting down and defining > what a timeline might be for doing these things for a spin would be a > good idea, particularly if we can define how it would work in relation > to the overall Fedora schedule. > > Workflow is a good thing. Defining it and publishing it is even > better. If others feel that this is a definite, ongoing problem, then > we should resolve it together, not point fingers at each other. Would it be advisable to have important Marketting,Design,etc.. request deadlines on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Schedule#Development_Schedule and associated release schedules like: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/13/Schedule as a one-stop overview that puts request deadlines in context with a release cycle? I'm also not sure there's an understood expectation on how long an initial spin approval process takes so in the case of LXDE spin specifically the entire process could have been started too late in the F13 release cycle to get support from other groups in a timely manner. -jef _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
