Board Strategic Working Group Meeting Recap 2010-01-18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting:Board_strategic_working_group_2010-01-18

== Roll Call ==
* Attendees: John Poelstra, Matt Domsch, Paul Frields, Mike McGrath, 
Chris Tyler, Colin Walters

== Working Group Kick-off ==
* Set ground rules for our meetings going forward
** Start on time/be early
*** Communicate in advance if you will not attend so we don't have to go 
searching for/pinging people in vain
** Everyone helps with meeting notes
** Everyone leaves the meeting with an action item or something to bring 
back next time--we aren't leaving everything to one person
** Meetings will last 60 minutes or less
** John Poelstra will act as the meeting facilitator with permission to:
*** keep the meetings moving
*** make sure the meeting ends on time
*** publish meeting minutes
*** suggest ownership of tasks (among group members)
** We will make decisions by ''consensus''
*** Meaning--everyone agrees enough to support the proposal, even if not 
everyone is wild about the idea
*** The term ''decision'' is used in the context of our working group 
discusions--not ''deciding things for the board, Fedora, etc.
* Our discussions in these meetings are to:
** pull together past unresolved issues while not ''solving'' them
** bring loose items together into formulated proposals the board as a 
whole can discuss and approve
* Initial work will be cataloging all of the issues
** Proposing (not dictating) solutions will be a follow-up step
** Send cataloged list to advisory-board for sanity check to make sure 
we've collected (not solved) everything

== Meeting Outcomes ==
* Finished in 57 minutes (3 minutes early)
* Emphasis of meeting was on setting up structure and how we plan to 
work issues through
* Decided on initial approach:
*# Catalog all the issues we understand to have been raised as questions
*# Break cataloged issues into two groups:
*#* Issues we believe are resolved with a reference to where and how it 
was resolved
*#* Issues we believe are unanswered with references to our ''to-do'' list
*# Explain in plain terms why the working group and the Board are 
pursuing these issues
*# Catalog initiatives the board has started, but not clearly resolved
*#* For example, website redesign, Chris Aillon's proposal, Spot's 
Proposal, Persona's, etc.
* The rest of the meeting we worked as a group cataloging the issues the 
board is grappling with
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Unfinished_Board_issues

== Other Observations/Side Discussion ==
* Is there a disconnect between what the community thinks the board 
should do, and what the board thinks the board should do. Dominant views 
seem to be:
** dispute mediators
** looking out for Fedora's feature
* If the community does not agree with the Board's charter they may not 
agree with its actions
* Current board charter: [[Board#Responsibilities]]

== Agenda for Next Meeting ==
# Be ready to publish the list of resolved and unresolved issues to 
advisory-board list for sanity check
# Explain why this working group and the Board are pursuing these issues
# Catalog open initiatives

== Next Meeting ==
* Monday, January 25, 2010 @ 15:00 EST
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux