On 01/14/2010 02:05 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:46:54PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> On Thursday 14 January 2010 10:30:45 am Justin M. Forbes wrote: >> This is not a board issue. If we can not build it in fedora then we can not >> ship it period. you are free to host it on your fedorapeople space and >> document how to get it. Best thing to do would be for the upstream project to >> host the iso and make it available for download. >> >> virtio-win drivers are not something that fedora can realistically support. >> we cannot build them we cannot issue fixes. we have no way to realistically do >> anything with them. > > Fedora the distribution can't build these. I agree. > > Fedora the Project can, as members have shown. In this case the open > source software requires non-Fedora software to build. > > We do distribute content that isn't built in koji. It's all at > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/. We can't recreate the ogg > videos hosted there either. How is this different? I would argue that the virtio-win drivers are not content, but code. ~spot _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
