On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:05:16PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:46:54PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > On Thursday 14 January 2010 10:30:45 am Justin M. Forbes wrote: > > This is not a board issue. If we can not build it in fedora then we can not > > ship it period. you are free to host it on your fedorapeople space and > > document how to get it. Best thing to do would be for the upstream project to > > host the iso and make it available for download. > > > > virtio-win drivers are not something that fedora can realistically support. > > we cannot build them we cannot issue fixes. we have no way to realistically do > > anything with them. > > Fedora the distribution can't build these. I agree. > > Fedora the Project can, as members have shown. In this case the open > source software requires non-Fedora software to build. > > We do distribute content that isn't built in koji. It's all at > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/. We can't recreate the ogg > videos hosted there either. How is this different? I believe it's not. The only fundamental disconnect is the inability for us to do the 100% self-built, self-hosted part with the virtio-win code. Your point about alt.fp.o is a good one! -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
