On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:50:59AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >ok, so perhaps it's this planning that I am wondering about, and should >ask on the test list. > >So, not sure if this is just a rephrasing of this proposal, but: > >- All updates need to spend time in updates-testing unless they are > security related. Sounds like exactly what EPEL does. I think enforcement is manual there still, and that isn't going to scale to Fedora. The change should be fairly minimal though. >- All updates must have N karma to push to stable updates. Or some kind > of checkoff for QA. Code changes already have to be made for the similar critpath QA/releng signoff. Hopefully this would just be another simple todo there. >- updates-testing pushes are daily. stable updates pushes are weekly. I could do this right now with no change to any code. It could also be done independently of the rest of the above. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
