----- "Gianluca Sforna" <giallu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Please accept my apologies if this is not the proper place to ask. > > I've never read anything against this, so I'm wondering if it was > ever > brought up at all. > > Are Fedora ambassadors allowed to also be <put your alternate distro > name here> ambassadors? > It is better to do one thing well than to suck at many. With that being said, Fedora is about Freedom, one of those freedoms I hope includes Freedom of speech. One might choose to be an ambassador for a project just for the free shirt, while in their heart they agree with another project to a greater degree, I think this is wrong. Go with what you believe in, if you believe that Linux in general is the answer to most questions perhaps you should take up that flag. I don't think taking that stance should exclude you from being a Fedora Ambassador it certainly would not forcibly include you in that formal group. I choose to not be a formal "Fedora Ambassador" yet when ever practical I suggest Fedora to people interested. When Fedora is impractical I suggest Red Hat Enterprise Linux, CentOS, Ubuntu, IPCop or some other distro. I think it is foolish to think that Fedora is perfect for every situation or is perfect in general. -- Bob ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Robert 'Bob' Jensen || Fedora Unity Founder | | bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx || http://fedoraunity.org/ | | http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/ | | http://blogs.fedoraunity.org/bobjensen | | http://www.facebook.com/rpjensen | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
