On 12/01/2009 01:58 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > On 11/30/2009 09:07 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 12/01/2009 01:22 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: >> >>> >>> "and the extension by default". You're talking, specifically, about a >>> spin that has the mozilla-adblockplus rpm installed? That's it, no >>> alteration of files of any kind? >> >> Correct. >> > > I don't see how this can be objectionable since installing the extension > manually essentially does the very same thing. The trademark guidelines from Mozilla seems to restrict it. http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/policy.html "In addition, if you are distributing Mozilla binaries yourself, and wish to use the Mozilla Mark(s), you may not (a) disable, modify or otherwise interfere with any installation mechanism contained in a Mozilla product; (b) use any such installation mechanism to install any plug-ins, themes, extensions, software, or items other than the Mozilla product" Rahul _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
