On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 12/01/2009 12:57 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 00:21 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> > >> I don't really think its quite the same situation. I can't think of any > >> other package that I can't combine with another package in Fedora > >> without special permission from a third party. Besides Mozilla, can you > >> cite a single instance where Fedora Project has special trademark > >> agreements on modifications that is not inherited by downstreams? > > > > Wait a second here. > > > > We have the addblock extension packaged in Fedora right now? And we > > ship them combined in our "Everything" repo? And thus far, this is > > allowed for us to continue using the Firefox trademark? > > Appears so. > > > Are you going to do some modification to one of these packages in your > > remix that would change this status quo? > > No modifications. Just going to include Mozilla Firefox and the > extension by default. > "and the extension by default". You're talking, specifically, about a spin that has the mozilla-adblockplus rpm installed? That's it, no alteration of files of any kind? -Mike _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
