On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > inode0 wrote on 09.11.2009 06:16: >> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I meant to publish the questions on the 17th so we could begin >> generating them ASAP and have the answers returned by the 23rd giving >> a couple of days to you (I hope you are willing to help with this >> again) to work your magic on them. > > /me better should have kept his nose down, as then maybe someone else > might have taken care of that work > > I assume there is no one around that wants volunteers to do it? Please help again, your work last time made a real impact. >> So I think the only question is whether to have the nomination period >> before or after the publication of the questions. I'm not sure how I >> feel about that. > > Actually I'm not completely sure myself. A bit of overlap could work as > well... If I don't hear any yelling what I think I plan to do at this point is have the nomination period and the collection of questions overlap completely running Nov. 10-16. The final questions can be published for the candidates to answer on the 17th and we'll give them one week until the 23rd to return them. That will hopefully give them time to carefully craft their answers without feeling overly rushed. One question about the question collection process that I need to know before sending out an announcement is where are those going to be collected? Will the page here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections/Questionnaire be "reset" to begin the current cycle as a collection point for the new questions? Thanks, John _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
