On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:50:18PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 23:16 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > This sounds pretty interesting to me. I think I even understand it. > > > > You're hopefully hitting two really important targets here -- making > > the stuff for the N+1 release always more installable, minus some > > delta for some broken deps, which of course we can continue to make > > less frequent; and not slowing down the ability for developers to > > submit and build brand new stuff. > > > > Since this is essentially No Frozen Rawhide v2.0, are you planning to > > update that wiki page with this new proposal? > > I didn't really think this was any different than no frozen rawhide. I > may have worded it differently, but the basic concept at least in my > head has been the same all along. I've just gotten better at explaining > it. What I left the FAD in RDU thinking was that you were essentially starting up a branch for N+2 earlier, around feature freeze. Maybe I completely misunderstood. The explanation here was much clearer if so. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
