On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 08:13:29PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > This is why I feel so strongly that we should not be assuming that the > > > people we see every day in our roles in the Fedora community, > > > participating and contributing in constructive ways, are de facto > > > representative of our only target audience. Do we want those people > > > involved? Almost invariably the answer is "yes." But there are many > > > more people we reach, and more that we want to be reaching, to > > > encourage an appreciation for sustainable software freedom, on the > > > terms we set out in our mission and core values: > > > > > > > Can you give some more detailed examples here? You've defined the people > > we see day to day but then went on to describe the people we don't see day > > to day. Those two groups combined are everyone :) > > Dangling reply never went out: > > People we see daily: Packagers, admins, and developers. > People we don't, in decreasing levels of visibility: Ambassadors, bug > filers, potential bug filers, independent open source developers, > students > Also windows users, oracle employees, those without computers. I guess I'm just not following the logic. If you're saying we should cater to those we don't ever see, how? -Mike _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
