On 10/16/2009 03:06 PM, William Jon McCann wrote: > Hmm, I probably didn't do a very good job getting the point across in > that page. I'm trying to describe the experience we want to provide > from a design point of view. I don't think you have a chance of > improving anything until you can consider an update to be more than > just a new package. So, I think I agree with everything in this paragraph. :) I would be interested to see if you could flesh this information out quite a bit more. Specifically, I'd like to see some tangible examples of what this model would look like, from the perspective of a packager and from the perspective of a user. I'd like to know what (if any) changes would need to be made to Fedora's infrastructure (koji, bodhi) as well as to Fedora (the Linux distribution). I'd even love to see some mockups illustrating how this is different/improved. I suspect there are some very good and useful ideas in here, I just want to have them clarified and brought out for others (like me) to understand and help implement. ~spot _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
