On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:33 PM, inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2009/10/14 Máirín Duffy <mairin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> On 10/14/2009 03:00 PM, Tim Burke wrote: >>> >>> Máirín Duffy wrote: >>>> >>> sounds like RHEL >> >> I *think* (and I'm relaying 3rd party information and then speculating on >> it, so this may be an exercise in futility) that the difference is that she >> said Fedora was on the leading edge, and that's why they had always >> gravitated towards it in the past. RHEL tends to be a bit behind Fedora, for >> the sake of stability. Even so, when Fedora was leading edge a couple of >> years ago, it was still stable enough for these folks to do their work. > > But I've been running Fedora as my primary desktop from F7 on and it > has been plenty stable for me to do my work. So I think Jeff is right, > it would be really nice to know more about the work they are doing > that exposes this "instability." Most of the issues I have helped people through have been things that have been documented in the past at one point or another: pulseaudio changes a couple releases ago, nvidia changes another release, kde another release, etc. The issues are they are not expecting to 'beta-test' software after its been released (as someone who had been using RHL since 1997 told me... I think he is now an Ubuntu advocate.) -- Stephen J Smoogen. Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for? -- Robert Browning _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
