On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, inode0 wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > So lets leave the other missions in place, as suggested in the paper, and >> > just add one? Is there anyone else on the list that thinks trying to >> > build a usable, general purpose desktop is not worth being a mission of >> > the Fedora Project? >> >> Here is what I believe is Red Hat's mission statement: "To be the >> catalyst in communities of customers, contributors, and partners >> creating better technology the open source way." >> >> They don't think that an enterprise server operating system is worth mentioning? >> >> Details like this are a trap and should be avoided. >> > > The management at Red hat don't let the engineers do whatever they want > all willy nilly. As such they don't have as many issues figuring out what > they showed up to do that day. Trap or not, it's guidance. > > Anyway, I'll get back to creating free code and content, whatever the hell > that is. And I think that free code and content is just as important to our mission. John _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
