On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 05:07:02PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Seth Vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Since the board defines which spin is the default spin then I > > suggest the board Make the kde or xfce spin the default spin for > > F14. > > > > It won't hurt users upgrading b/c they are just upgrading. > > And users reinstalling are reinstalling. > > > > It makes it clear that the spins process is serious and f'real and > > it will test how well our processes work. > > > > And if we have stunning success then the board re-evals the default > > spin again. > > > > thoughts? > > I think performing an experiment that switches all the defaults, > invalidates the docs, walkthroughs, etc. and associated community > knowledge is a *really bad idea* if we're trying to provide any sort > of consistent user experience. I agree. I don't see how this gets us closer to a more deliberate approach to dealing with any target audience. It makes the Fedora distribution a zigzag that confuses and then loses audience. What makes the spins process f'real is the fact that communities who care about those spins are able to gather effort around them, produce them, and have them hosted on Fedora Project infrastructure, and promote them to whatever extent they like. As a thought experiment this is arguably worthwhile, but it would fail with the audience on which the other current FAB conversation is converging. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
