John Poelstra (poelstra@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > I had hoped to spend my time answering the original questions I > posed, but instead spent it reading the other posts and trying to > write some thoughtful replies which always take me too long :-/ I > plan to reply to my original questions by the end of tomorrow > (2009-10-09), hopefully earlier. > > I don't agree that it is fine that a number of board members have > remained silent. I believe we have been elected and appointed with > an obligation to participate. I recognize and respect that everyone > has busy lives. I also believe that if other things get in the way > we have an obligation to let others know or step down so others can > get involved. > > I think we should hear from everyone and that the position of each > board member should be made clear. Maybe some have been silent > because they think the way this are currently is fine. If that is > the case, they should say that and motion that we drop this topic > from future agendas. Perhaps they are in the same boat as you were. I know that actually attempting to *schedule* out an hour of time or so to write up a lengthy response is problematic with other meetings and beta fires; it's why I haven't responded to (or even read much of) the thread until this afternoon. Bill _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
