On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On 10/07/2009 12:11 AM, John Poelstra wrote: > > > > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-board-meeting/2009-10-01/fedora-board-meeting.2009-10-01-16.03.log.html > > > > > > At last week's meeting we said we would continue our discussion here. > > Here I go :) > > > > 1) I'm still advocating that it is our responsibility to move things > > forward and own these issues. Are there any board members that > > disagree? Speak now or we will assume you are in agreement. :-) > > I've been thinking a lot about how I want to respond to this thread. > Here are my thoughts: > > * I am troubled by the subtext of the repeated questioning of "What is > Fedora", because I really don't think that is the question that is being > asked. Instead, I think the question being asked (or at least, the > question being answered) is: "Who is Fedora (the Linux Distribution) for?" > > If indeed, we are attempting to answer that question, it implies that > there are users for whom Fedora is not, and will never be, a good fit. My wife and both of my parents answered no to every single question on this page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Is_Fedora_For_Me Given that, it seems obvious to me that Fedora is not for them. -Mike _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
