Bill Nottingham said the following on 09/30/2009 09:33 AM Pacific Time:
John Poelstra (poelstra@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
I think we still have a little work to do. I'm not sure all the
bullets in this section are in harmony with each other.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives#Creating_a_Free_.28as_in_Freedom.29_distribution
The problem is that those bullets aren't guiding, which is sort of what
Mike is asking for. None of those things implies anything about the target
market or target userbase. The closest one is about how Fedora is F/OSS and
That was the point of my previous post (cut from above). We are going
around in circles because we aren't being direct. Expecting people to
make the right inference hasn't worked.
therefore not interested in working on/supporting/etc. closed-source
software - but that's not a point you can make design decisions around.
You could claim 'usability and a "just works" philosophy' is a design point,
but that applies just as much to Asterisk or TurboGears as it does to
Firefox and GNote.
To sharpen the Objectives we first need to finish:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Overview#Target_Audience
John
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
