Re: changing content licenses (OPL => CC BY SA)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- "Robert 'Bob' Jensen" <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Does anyone remember why "CC BY SA" was not chosen over the OPL when
> we went through all this a few years ago? Is this just all part of the
> Creative Commons marketing effort? An effort that is failing for me,
> the idea of a "CC" license is diluted and confused by all the
> different options. It seems today everyone has to have a (CC) license,
> soon to become the "Members Only" jacket of the early 80's?
> 

I guess my question was, is this change for the sake of change? Nothing gained from how I read Richard's comment.

-- Bob

------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       Robert 'Bob' Jensen        ||       Fedora Unity Founder       |
|       bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx        ||      http://fedoraunity.org/     |
|                   http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/                   |
|                http://blogs.fedoraunity.org/bobjensen                |
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux