----- "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > IMHO, a move to CC BY-SA is more supportive of Fedora's mission to > promote free and interchangeable content, and makes sense. > Does anyone remember why "CC BY SA" was not chosen over the OPL when we went through all this a few years ago? Is this just all part of the Creative Commons marketing effort? An effort that is failing for me, the idea of a "CC" license is diluted and confused by all the different options. It seems today everyone has to have a (CC) license, soon to become the "Members Only" jacket of the early 80's? -- Bob ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Robert 'Bob' Jensen || Fedora Unity Founder | | bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx || http://fedoraunity.org/ | | http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/ | | http://blogs.fedoraunity.org/bobjensen | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
