On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 08:53:31AM -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for providing this summary Chris. > > > > In the context of the "one Fedora package" question, it's important to > > remember that the key goals of having Remixes are to (1) allow the > > downstream to inherit some of Fedora's brand power, and (2) help the > > downstream drive interest in Fedora as the upstream. > > So here's the one question that I think will bake your noodle. > What if someone walked into the project and wanted to do a coronary > based distribution instead of a binary rpm distribution, using Fedora > srpms as source material? > > reference: http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Conary:RPM_Package_Recipe_HOWTO > > Would we feel comfortable extending the Fedora brand power to that > sort of experiment under the terms of the Fedora Remix secondary mark? Probably closer to rpm packaging: What if there is someone that rebuilds Fedora rpms optimized for $subarch or maybe build for non-supported platforms? I think currently the answer to all of the above is no. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpvXCNI4EWgO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
