On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for providing this summary Chris. > > In the context of the "one Fedora package" question, it's important to > remember that the key goals of having Remixes are to (1) allow the > downstream to inherit some of Fedora's brand power, and (2) help the > downstream drive interest in Fedora as the upstream. So here's the one question that I think will bake your noodle. What if someone walked into the project and wanted to do a coronary based distribution instead of a binary rpm distribution, using Fedora srpms as source material? reference: http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Conary:RPM_Package_Recipe_HOWTO Would we feel comfortable extending the Fedora brand power to that sort of experiment under the terms of the Fedora Remix secondary mark? -jef _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
