On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 06:40:55PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:02:27PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> A number of Fedora mailing lists have very outdated descriptions >>> including references to "Fedora Core". Is anyone responsible for >>> making sure that the descriptions of all the mailing lists are >>> up2date and generally taking care of them? >>> >>> The wiki could use some more attention as well. FESCo is still >>> posting updates to wiki pages under the Extras hierarchy for >>> example. >> >> Why is any of that fedora-advisory-board material? > > I think the disorganization of mailing lists is a project wide concern > and we have discussed it in here before. Knowing who, if anybody is > taking care of it, would help choose a more direct venue perhaps. IIRC there is a *-owner address for each list (e.g. fedora-devel-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx). You could send email to the list owners that way, and any one of them should be able to remove "Core" from the description. Chris Tyler and I updated the description of fedora-list not too long ago, for example. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgpiet9SwhC6j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
