2008/10/29 Matt Domsch <matt@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > US Presidential election should be over in about a week, give or take > the lawyers and press coverage. I don't expect any Fedora > contributors are so involved with those that they couldn't take a few > minutes between now and December 3 to add their name to a nomination > list should they so choose. I just reported what I've heard. BTW, now I know that I know there isn't a conflict between this two events. Thank you > Thanks for bringing that up again. I'll be happy to try to coordinate > several town-hall style IRC "debates" for each of the various > elections, if people think that would help considerably in trying to > decide whom to vote for. I personally find most IRC meetings to be > very low bandwidth (e.g. I could get 4x more done in the same time if > not using IRC). But I'm open to be swayed (and note, it's not really > up to me, I'm just kicking off the conversation). (moderated) > conference calls and/or VOIP are also possible. > > I'd hope we get enough nominations for each elected position that a > healthy debate, IRC or otherwise, would be beneficial to the > electorate. But I don't anticipate needing more than one debate per > elected group, do you? I'm agree with you in that point, a debate is worth a million ones. Finally I personally think IRC is the best way. Regards Francesco Ugolini p.s. FAmSCo is starting planning FAmSCo elections, we will stay tuned here, trying to get updates and give updates about our status. _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
