On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 08:54 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Tom spot Callaway > > I'll probably whip up a "fedora-remix-logos" package once we have the > > licensing and guidelines set in stone. > > And maybe remix-release and remix-release-notes to match the generic-* > package set we have now? Ehh. I think that using fedora-remix-logos + generic-release is fine. Most people who are using the Fedora Remix mark will have a custom -release package anyways. > I guess there will be some sort of discussion on when its okay for the > fedora-remix-logos package to be used instead of the generic-logos > package. Or does the remix mark let us do away with the generic-logos > concept completely? No, because there are still use-cases where we do not permit someone to use the Fedora Remix mark. ~spot _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
