On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 20:20 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > Hey Paul, > > In today's FESCo meeting we discussed a proposal(1) to keep the > infrastructure open for EOL branches (which came from the Fedora Legacy > thread on the devel-list). We felt that the Board needs to also > weigh-in on this, since it deals with: > > 1. Goals of the project > 2. Use of the 'Fedora' brand (including possibly the trademarks) > 3. Infrastructure > > If the Board could look at this during the next board meeting, it would > be appreciated. > > 1) > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pertusus/Draft_keeping_infra_open_for_EOL I'm reposting this here to FAB (with Brian's blessing), mostly for the sake of transparency. The page linked above also has a "Discussion" tab which has been populated by some of the FESCo members. Let's add this to the upcoming week's agenda. We needn't rehash the ever-expanding thread-o'-doom on fedora-devel-list here, but we should consider the balance between Fedora's stated objectives[1], and the desire to allow contributors the freedom to pursue new avenues. = = = [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
