On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 22:30 +0200, Max Spevack wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: > > > I don't suppose we could just defer to the Fedora Art team to make a > > decision, since we have set them up to be the authoritative voice on > > precisely these kinds of matters? > > +1 -- this is how we prevent bikeshedding. Delegate choices to the > appropriate project, with the Fedora Board ensuring overall sanity. I presumed that choices had already been vetted by Art and what we were presented with was a stalemate or set of choices that Art wanted a decision on. If that hasn't happened (yet), then definitely let it. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Community Gardener Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
