On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 10:38 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 08:39 -0500, inode0 wrote: >> > Another thing that might help is maybe a pre-election statement from >> > the board to wrap some context around an election. What has the >> > current board accomplished? What are the major open issues the board >> > is currently dealing with? Then the candidates rather than saying "I'm >> > going to work to make Fedora great!" could actually address some of >> > the outstanding issues directly. Without some focus on issues that >> > need to be addressed what are we really to base votes on? >> >> This would actually be pretty neat. I had a hard time coming up with >> some text as my candidacy announcement, this would help a lot. > > Agreed. I just updated the elections page to reflect this: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/Elections > Could we move the voting to mid release, or starting 2 weeks after the release? That would give a bit more time and energy to people who are concentrating on things that are release oriented? -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
