On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 20:58 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 16:51 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 4:45 PM, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This is not an unfair point. Being able to spend all your time on > > > something does make it more likely you'll be well known. I mentioned > > > this before but I'd be in favor of consecutive term limits for being on > > > the fedora board for rh employees tasked with working on fedora full > > > time. > > > > > > so, for example, I could not run for another term, but I could sit out a > > > couple of terms and come back if I wished to run for election, again. > > > > > > What would you think about that? > > > > I'd be happy to have a term limit even as a non-rh employee. > > Agreed. > > Now that you are both on the Board (again), just vote that into the > bylaws. You realize that this would mean Matt Domsch could no longer be a member for life, right? ;-) -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
