On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 23:12 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 24.06.2008 23:02, Max Spevack wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > >> But three of those four elected are Red Hat employees for whom working > >> and contributing to Fedora is part of their job (afaik; but is it the > >> case for Seth? not completely sure, sorry. > > Spot, Jesse, and Seth are all paid to spend 100% of their working time > > on tasks directly related to Fedora, or upstream tools (packages, build > > system, yum) that Fedora uses. > > Thx Max for the clarification. > > And just a clarification: there is nothing wrong with being a Red Hat > employee working on Fedora being elected to the board. It's just that > these three guys imho without purpose had a huge advantage in the > election due to their work. > > CU > knurd > > <humor> > P.S.: Earlier in this thread this could be read: > > >> Is there any sort of criteria they use to pick the last seat? I'm just > >> curious. > > The last seat is picked with the goal of balancing the background of the > > other seats on the Board. > > So we get a woman on board? > > /me hides > > </humor> What if a woman on the short list for this spot was a Red Hat employee? -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
