On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> wrote: > reading the "Goals" and "Future Plans" again and again, many of which are > either weak or unconvincing. Especially if you cannot map a person's name > to political activity on relevant mailing-lists. It's like "okay, I've > seen that name before, but I don't remember any valuable political > contributions that sounded promising and would justify voting for that > person [again]". Is the person competent? How do I know if I've not seen > any activity before? Just to be clear. Are you saying that my political activity has gone unnoticed? Would an organized debate (and I use that term as loosely as possible) between candidates help you decide how to spend your votes? -jef _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
