On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 15:10 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > IIRC, part of the question was what license the "code" involved in the > website fell under. That is does the css and templates for the websites > also fall under the OPL? Exactly the point of this thread. The *content* is under the OPL. The markup around just the content is probably covered by that OPL. But the rest of the site (CSS, Python, TurboGears, HTML, etc.) has not been licensed. It is, however, a contribution, so is covered at a minimum by the CLA. Do we have the right to license all those contributions at this point? That is, without the permission of the contributors? - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
