Re: bug triage considered useful?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On May 14, 2008, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am not denying this kind of job needs to be done, nor I am I denying
> this to be an unthankful job, but ... I am questioning their approach.

I think it's too early to draw any conclusions.

When the process first starts, there's a huge wave of low-hanging
fruit that may have been neglected for a very long time.

Once it gets into regime, *then* we can tell whether it generates too
much traffic or is otherwise harmful.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member       ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux