On Wed, 14 May 2008, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 05:07:52PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Provoking question: > > > > Am I the only person in Fedora who considers this bug triaging (esp. > > today's) to be producing more noise and spam than useful results? > > > Having had to personally deal with tens of thousands of bugs / bug > reports / issues / resolutions in the 9+ years I've been actively > developing Linux, I'm glad for _anyone_ who steps up and tries to > actively manage this list. Issues get resolved but not closed. > Issues get reported but lack follow-up (either developer or reporter) > on occasion. Eventually these need to get pruned, like any good > garden, leaving only the actual problems which need focus. The Triage > effort is designed to do exactly this. > > Does it generate some additional mail? Yes. Are they taking steps to > minimize the extra mail? Yes. But does that mail generation negate > the good they're accomplishing? IMHO, No. > Agreed, its a completely thankless job and an easy target but after these begining steps are over and the team is into a cycle I think it will do a great deal of good. -Mike _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
