Re: Board nominations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/5/5 Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 11:57 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>  > Jonathan Roberts wrote:
>  >
>  > > For me, it's two things: firstly, the experience thing. I've never
>  > > done anything like this before, and I'm sure there are plenty of
>  > > others who have far more experience who can do a far better job for
>  > > Fedora than I could!
>  > >
>  > > And actually, number two is similar, but I don't think I'd be
>  > > confident that I could do a good enough job for Fedora on the board
>  > > and I certainly wouldn't want to let people down.
>  > >
>  > > That said, I'm young and maybe in a few years I'll be putting myself
>  > > forward to run :)
>  >
>  > I don't see why you couldn't nominate yourself now. The "worst" possible
>  > result is that you don't get enough votes to get selected. Big deal? Not
>  > for me.  On the other end, if you do get elected you might learn a few
>  > things more which is always a good thing.
>
>  Absolutely agreed.  You could always campaign as the political
>  outsider! ;-)

OK - count me in... :)

Jon

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux