On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 11:57 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Jonathan Roberts wrote: > > > For me, it's two things: firstly, the experience thing. I've never > > done anything like this before, and I'm sure there are plenty of > > others who have far more experience who can do a far better job for > > Fedora than I could! > > > > And actually, number two is similar, but I don't think I'd be > > confident that I could do a good enough job for Fedora on the board > > and I certainly wouldn't want to let people down. > > > > That said, I'm young and maybe in a few years I'll be putting myself > > forward to run :) > > I don't see why you couldn't nominate yourself now. The "worst" possible > result is that you don't get enough votes to get selected. Big deal? Not > for me. On the other end, if you do get elected you might learn a few > things more which is always a good thing. Absolutely agreed. You could always campaign as the political outsider! ;-) -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
