Re: Draft Proposal: Spin Submission and Approval Process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Rahul Sundaram
<sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 What purpose does bugzilla components for every spin serve?

Patch submission for changes in kickstart logic.


I would prefer
 some other medium for feedback/ requests on actual spin changes.

'Some other'... is pretty unspecific.  Where would you prefer patches
for kickstart logic go?

I haven't ever got patches but if it does happen, some email address is preferable. I am currently maintaining several accepted spins: games, xfce and about a dozen localized spins. Among these, I only maintain a couple of packages. Almost 100% of the changes happen within the actual packages and are not spin specific. My effort is spend in developing a kickstart file, determining package changes, channeling feedback from users, brainstorming ideas with the respective maintainers, testing the images and some minimal changes for the live cd environment. What I would prefer not to do is getting bugs filed against the spin when it should have been filed against individual packages. I am not sure how exactly to accomplish that.

Rahul

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux