On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 01:23:38PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, John Poelstra wrote: > > > > > > === Secondary Arch Hosting === > > > * Can Fedora host binaries for secondary architectures? > > > * Change from original proposal > > > * makes it easier to get new mirrors and use mirror manager > > > * DECISION: board approves of Fedora hosting binaries for secondary > > > architectures > > > > > > > Any time frame on this? > > > > Just following up on this. Is it something we're planning on having > available for the Fedora 9 release? 300GB stored on Amazon S3 is $30 to upload it, then $45/month thereafter. I haven't wanted to go there, only because it wasn't clear we could control how many downloads there are from there, at $0.18/GB for downloads. Now I see we could limit who would download the data to some number of people who would be tasked with providing the bits on demand should there ever be a demand. _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
