On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 17:21 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > Max Spevack wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > >> Also, it would be useful for the report details to be public or > >> atleast more information on what is being reported. > > > > I would plan for total transparency. > > So do we, other then a board-list anything else is out in the open. > > > And +1 to Matt's comment. Make the actual NPO own the responsibility, > > but if they choose to, they can delegate it down to me as the liason > > between that NPO and Fedora/RH. > > > > And we'll probably need it, so I appreciate the offer. I'm very excited about the opportunity Fedora EMEA will have to develop Fedora's image and footprint in the region. I highly encourage the Fedora EMEA group to continue to use Max as a resource, but also remind them that just as for any other community members, the Fedora Advisory Board and the Fedora Project Board are here for you as well. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
