Max Spevack wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Also, it would be useful for the report details to be public or
atleast more information on what is being reported.
I would plan for total transparency.
So do we, other then a board-list anything else is out in the open.
And +1 to Matt's comment. Make the actual NPO own the responsibility,
but if they choose to, they can delegate it down to me as the liason
between that NPO and Fedora/RH.
And we'll probably need it, so I appreciate the offer.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
