2008/2/25, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Francesco Ugolini > <fugolini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Just a question: can this issue be discussed by the Fedora Board? > > > > We are making an effort to use the fedora-advisory-board list for as > much discussion on as many topics as we can. We really want to leave > the private board list for sensitive crap that we can't really have a > full open discussion about. And then the board conference calls are > for actually "voting" or "decreeing" or tasking things out to people > on the board to follow up on. > > The reality is, the best new ideas and the passionate people to drive > them forward gonna come from outside the board members, so taking > this to a private list isn't in anyone's best interest. What the > Board can do is guide new leaders for new areas, and when necessary > beat down whatever roadblocks exist that are getting in their way. > > -jef > > I don't want to ask you to make a private discussion, i think this place (fedora-advisory-board list) is right for such discussion and personally i like to take part in the "external" discussion of this issue (i'm interested in it). I only wanted to know if Fedora Board was discussing it yet. Thank you for your work Francesco _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
