On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 15:20 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 14:30 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 14:28 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, seth vidal wrote: > > > > > > >> Specific questions to be answered: > > > >> > > > >> 0. Invite the Fluendo folks to join. > > > > > > > > This is a bad idea and it looks like collusion. > > > > > > Wait... what? Explain this, because I don't see how transparent > > > discussions about user experience equal "collusion". > > > > do we invite gnome developers to discussion about gnome in the distro? > > Not generally. > > I beg your pardon ? I would ask you to reconsider that position. You may > be a member of the board, but you are not the ruler who takes decisions > above the heads of the affected people. > okay, I'm deeply confused here. This is the second time today that someone has taken an email from me as a declaration from on high. Is there a tagline being appended to my emails that says "and yes, I speak for everyone and everything in all cases, no matter what?" Is there some reason why people think I'm speaking for anyone other than myself? Does my email address says "seth vidal fedora board member - all my pronouncements are equivalent to edicts from the FPL"? No, it doesn't. the only person I represent is me. -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
