On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:47 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:38 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:34:00 -0500 > > Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Blech. Google (no pun intended) first, ask later. > > > > > > http://code.google.com/p/eeedora/ > > > > > > Short answer: Ethernet and WLAN modules, and XFCE. > > > > This is where we really really really need a more relaxed trademark > > policy, so that we can put out something like this for the Eee under > > the Fedora name, with Fedora branding, etc.. > > Alternately, why aren't those kernel modules in Fedora? If they were > using all Fedora packages, then they _could_ use the Fedora name. csnook is working on getting atl2/atlx upstream, and ath5k is being hammered on by someone as we speak, I'm sure. http://people.redhat.com/csnook/atl2/ -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
