Rahul Sundaram wrote:
What you said so far implies that voting for board members is or should be based on their take on individual issues rather than their ability to direct the project in a right way, including the vision to initiate and lead the project evolution, of which Fedora is a bright example.Vladimir Kosovac wrote:Aren't mailing lists/blogs/individual contacts providing enough insight? I know you are keeping an eye on them, as should everybody else who cares.I wouldn't be asking if it did.
That ability is more or less easily provable by people's previous involvement at the project level or their contributions to SIGs/subprojects, which is open to all through said lists and blogs.
Vladimir
Rahul _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
