On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 18:28 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > Can anyone think of any action items the infrastructure team (or others > for that matter) may need to do as a result of discussions during > hackfest/fudcon? > > -Mike > > /me hates the phrase "Action Items" but "Stuff to do from FUDCon" just > didn't sound right. I use that phrase myself, sorry if it's obscene. :-D I'm thinking back to our SSO session, where of course I did a lot of talking (maybe 1/2 to be fair) and not any writing. But we talked about: * being a WordPress/Lyceum (multiuser) provider * Seth knows about this as well as of this morning, and didn't immediately want to kill anyone * using it to test OpenID capabilities (there's an OpenID 2.0 plugin for WP) Hopefully this will spark some memories of other things that came up, but that's what comes to my mind immediately. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
